<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Hyphal Tip &#187; experimental evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fungalgenomes.org/blog/category/evolution/experimental-evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fungalgenomes.org/blog</link>
	<description>Digesting the fungal genomes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Neurospora speciation through experimental evolution</title>
		<link>http://fungalgenomes.org/blog/2008/02/neurospora-speciation-through-experimental-evolution/</link>
		<comments>http://fungalgenomes.org/blog/2008/02/neurospora-speciation-through-experimental-evolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Stajich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurospora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speciation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antagonistic epistasis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asexual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cerevisiae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filamentous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fitness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phenotype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phylogenetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saccharomyces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fungalgenomes.org/blog/2008/02/neurospora-speciation-through-experimental-evolution/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><a href="http://www.researchblogging.org"><img src="http://www.researchblogging.org/images/rbicons/ResearchBlogging-Medium-White.png" border="0" alt="ResearchBlogging.org" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="80" height="50" align="left" /></a>Dettman, Anderson, and Kohn recently published a paper in BMC Evolutionary Biology on reproductive experimental evolution in two Neurospora crassa populations evolved under different selective conditions.   This is a great study that complements work published last year in <a rev="review" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05856">Nature</a> on experimental evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations.   Neurospora populations were evolved under high salt and low temperature and were started from either high diversity (interspecific crosses, N. crassa vs N. intermedia) or low diversity (intraspecific cross, two N. crassa isolates D143 (Louisiana, USA)and D69 (Ivory Coast)) as described in Figure 1. The experimentally evolved populations were then tested for asexual and sexual fitness (they were taken through complete meiotic cycle throughout the experiment to avoid insure there was selection on the sexual reproduction pathway.</p>
<p [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left"><a href="http://www.researchblogging.org"><img src="http://www.researchblogging.org/images/rbicons/ResearchBlogging-Medium-White.png" border="0" alt="ResearchBlogging.org" hspace="2" vspace="2" width="80" height="50" align="left" /></a>Dettman, Anderson, and Kohn recently published a paper in BMC Evolutionary Biology on reproductive experimental evolution in two <em>Neurospora crassa</em> populations evolved under different selective conditions.   This is a great study that complements work published last year in <a rev="review" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05856">Nature</a> on experimental evolution in <em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em> populations.   <em>Neurospora</em> populations were evolved under high salt and low temperature and were started from either high diversity (interspecific crosses, <em>N. crassa</em> vs <em>N. intermedia</em>) or low diversity (intraspecific cross, two <em>N. crassa</em> isolates D143 (Louisiana, USA)and D69 (Ivory Coast)) as described in Figure 1. The experimentally evolved populations were then tested for asexual and sexual fitness (they were taken through complete meiotic cycle throughout the experiment to avoid insure there was selection on the sexual reproduction pathway.</p>
<p align="left"><span id="more-144"></span> D143 and D69 are both <em>N. crassa</em> NcA clade species so they should be quite similar to each other, hence the low diversity cross.  While the <em>N. intermedia</em> cross represents two distinct phylogenetic species. and they are both See <a href="http://pmb.berkeley.edu/%7Etaylor/text/dettman2003a.html">Dettman et al 2003</a> for the relationship between these strains.</p>
<p><a title="Dettman BMC EvolBiol 2008, Figure 1" rel="attachment wp-att-145" href="http://fungalgenomes.org/blog/2008/02/neurospora-speciation-through-experimental-evolution/dettman-bmc-evolbiol-2008-figure-1/"></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a title="Dettman BMC EvolBiol 2008, Figure 1" rel="attachment wp-att-145" href="http://fungalgenomes.org/blog/2008/02/neurospora-speciation-through-experimental-evolution/dettman-bmc-evolbiol-2008-figure-1/"><img src="http://fungalgenomes.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dettman_2008_fig1.thumbnail.jpg" border="0" alt="Dettman BMC EvolBiol 2008, Figure 1" hspace="2" vspace="2" /></a></p>
<p align="left">The authors were able to show that divergent selection through adaptation to different environments can lead to specialization that produced Dobzhansky-Muller genetic interactions. This is an example of ecological speciation.   In other words, the adaptation to different environments can lead to new species purely on the basis of fixing alleles necessary for survival in the environments and not on the phenotype of reproductive isolation at all.  When evolved individuals interact, the hybrids are less fit or even sterile even though the selected trait was only on a high salt or low temperature regime.   Ecological speciation can arise from the decreased fitness of hybrids from differential selection of the environment.   So this reproductive isolation is happening even though reproductive isolation was not selected for during the experiment suggesting that interactions between alleles which did not arise in the same genetic background are influencing the poor hybrid fitness (negative or antagonistic <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/epistasis">epistasis</a>).</p>
<p align="left">This work represents the first experimental evolution system for ecological speciation in a filamentous fungus and only the second in a fungus (the other fungal is the <em>S. cerevisiae </em> Dettman et al 2007 experiment). According to the authors, the only other previous work on experimental evolution to test ecological speciation models has been done in <em>Drosophila</em>.</p>
<p align="left">I really like how this study uses the power of fungi as model systems for evolutionary and cellular biology and produces some clear support for ecological speciation model.  In addition the ability to map mutations and sequence these strains will hopefully lead to an understanding of the molecular basis of the adaptations and the negative epistasis.</p>
<p align="left">Dettman, J.R., Anderson, J.B., Kohn, L.M. (2008). Divergent adaptation promotes reproductive isolation among experimental populations of the filamentous fungus Neurospora. <span style="font-style: italic">BMC Evolutionary Biology, 8</span>(1), 35. DOI: <a rev="review" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-35">10.1186/1471-2148-8-35</a><br />
Dettman, J.R., Sirjusingh, C., Kohn, L.M., Anderson, J.B. (2007). Incipient speciation by divergent adaptation and antagonistic epistasis in yeast. <span style="font-style: italic">Nature, 447</span>(7144), 585-588. DOI: <a rev="review" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05856">10.1038/nature05856</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fungalgenomes.org/blog/2008/02/neurospora-speciation-through-experimental-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Experimental cooperative evolution</title>
		<link>http://fungalgenomes.org/blog/2007/01/experimental-cooperative-evolution/</link>
		<comments>http://fungalgenomes.org/blog/2007/01/experimental-cooperative-evolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Stajich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journal club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lichen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symbiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tiling array]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fungalgenomes.org/blog/2007/01/experimental-cooperative-evolution/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A paper in Nature this week describes how a few mutations can  alter the interactions between species in a biofilm from competitive to cooperative system. This is a great study that goes from start to finish on studying community interactions, looking at an evolved phenotype, and understanding the genetic and physiological basis for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://fungalgenomes.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/researchblogging-medium-trans.png" alt="Blogging about Peer-Reviewed Research" align="right" border="0" hspace="3" vspace="3" />A <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05514" title="Hansen et al" target="_blank">paper in Nature</a> this week describes how a few mutations can  alter the interactions between species in a biofilm from competitive to cooperative system. This is a great study that goes from start to finish on studying community interactions, looking at an evolved phenotype, and understanding the genetic and physiological basis for the adaptation.</p>
<p><em>Acinetobacter</em> sp. and <em>Pseudomonas putida</em>  were raised in a carbon-limited environment with only benzyl alcohol as the carbon source.  <em>Acinetobacter</em> can processes the benzyl alcohol, while <em>P. putida</em> is unable to.   <em>Acinetobacter </em>takes up the bezyl alcohol and secretes benzoate that <em>P. putida</em> can then use as a carbon source.  The research group propagated these in chemostats and looked at different starting concentrations of the organisms.  They found that evolved <em>P. putida</em> had a different morphology and did several experiments to determine the relative fitness of the derived and ancestral genotype.</p>
<p>They went on to also map the mutations in <em>P. putida</em> and found two independent mutations in <em>wapH</em> (<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=protein&amp;val=119859660" style="font-style: italic">I think this is the right gene</a>)â€”a gene involved in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis.  They then engineered the ancestral strain to have a mutation in <span style="font-style: italic">P. putida</span> and found the rough colony phenotype morphology indistinguishable from the strain derived from experimental evolution.</p>
<p>There are various evolutionary and niche adaptation implications arising from this study.  One application to mycology is to how lichens evolved in that an algael cell and a fungal cell must communicate and cooperate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fungalgenomes.org/blog/2007/01/experimental-cooperative-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
